Message for Daniel about site links

Mike Zee · Post by **Mike Zee** » Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:05 pm

Hi, Daniel, just a note for. I guess you can remove this post later, 'cos there is nothing to 'discuss' here, really <IMG SRC="http://www.interruptor.ch/cgi-bin/discu ... /happy.gif" ALT=":)"> I just was browsing through youer site as I was updating my page to make link(s), and I've noticed that you have links to ZEE DUB LAB/Mike Zee at your links section and also somewhere at BASS-section in dub-techniques. If you ever have time to deal with this, could you please to change the links url from old-dead audiogalaxy.com-hosted site to my new location. I'd hate people go to that audiogalaxy page, because it's ald, full with dead links and I have no access/control to update it. I wish I could delete the site, but I can't do this, there's no way to get any respond from audiogalaxy. My new and only url is: <A HREF="http://www.mzentertainment.com/zdl.html" TARGET="_blank">http://www.mzentertainment.com/zdl.html</A> or even better directly to the page, which is: <A HREF="http://www.mzentertainment.com/dub_lab.htm" TARGET="_blank">http://www.mzentertainment.com/dub_lab.htm</A> I also just updated the page with link to your site, it's on the left side of the page, scroll down a bit, it's as 'FEATURED DUB-SITE' there, check it out. Also I've made some direct links to some of your sections, so let me know if you wish it to be something different.... it's better if you reply here, however you can e-mail me direct to this e-mail: mikezeedub@msn.com /later man, /Mike Zee aka Dr.ZEE

Post by **interruptor** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:18 am

nice.. thanks for the links & artwork! in fact since years i don't receive as much visitors from any particular site as yours, except for google, alta vista, etc (according to my site statistics). will update your links soon. :-)

Mike Zee · Post by **Mike Zee** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 7:01 pm

cool, Daniel <IMG SRC="http://www.interruptor.ch/cgi-bin/discu ... /happy.gif" ALT=":)"> speaking of traffic/visitors, I just must say : "God Bless Google!" ...heh heh, really if not for google, I may have twice less visitors overall on the net. The best thing about google is that it looks like its database is updated pretty fast. Like for example if I add page with new album to the site - in a couple of weeks it is already 'searchable' with all the content of the page (meaning it will find the name of the track in the album listed on that page etc...) and btw, if you search for 'dub discussion' you get it RIGHT! on google <IMG SRC="http://www.interruptor.ch/cgi-bin/discu ... /happy.gif" ALT=":)"> ***** a little note for You on tech side: 1. I've noticed that on your main/home page in the code/source - you have a little 'problem' - your keywords in the tag are not separated by ",", this may reflect on search results ...well I am not sure about it, but I'd fix this. 2. Also I think you need to work on better keywords for your VST plugins page, also separate them clearly by ",", and include kewords like: tape delay plug-in, vintage delay plug-in, echo plug-in, free VST plug-ins, dub siren, dub sirene, dub sirene plug-in,... etc etc...., you see - this is kind of stuff people are searching, it's sort of like a game...but it does work and worth of effort at the end. Also it is important to have the 'words' actually in the body.../body content..... ok, man btw, your latest site designs are really cool <IMG SRC="http://www.interruptor.ch/cgi-bin/discu ... /happy.gif" ALT=":)"> /Mike Zee aka DrZEE

Post by **interruptor** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:02 am

i see mike.. if i don't separate the keywords by comas they will be understood as one single large keyword and therefore never match any search query :-( i'll correct that soon. actually when i started coding websites a few years back i cared about these keywords, but i think nowadays search engines hardly analyse these anymore. what really gives you a good ranking in google (and other search engines too i guess) is having many people pointing links to your page. there is a "race" going on between search engine programmers and website coders trying to get to the top of the search result pages. in the beginning it was enough to write 5000 times "tits" on your page to be listed on top of the corresponding web search. nowadays search engines are trying to analyse the real content of a page and it's popularity in the web comunity. keywords are no content as they are not visible to the user. Actually the keywords feature of html was inspired by the notion that you can trust the author of a webpage. How naive can human beings be.. :-) by the way <A HREF="http://www.netmechanic.com/toolbox/power_user.htm">this service</A> helps to find html errors.

Mike Zee · Post by **Mike Zee** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 3:34 pm

hmmmmmmm. I guess i need to update my miserable "knowledge' about this...heh heh This stuff was out of my interest for a while I must say. The way it used to be (or as I can remember) searches used to 'read' keywords and then 'look' through the body/actual content of the page and then sort of 'calculate'. well this can be manipulated by site-designer. Well, man, you know.... I still think you better 'clean up' your pages 'head'-tags according to "old school <IMG SRC="http://www.interruptor.ch/cgi-bin/discu ... /happy.gif" ALT=":)">" structure.... just in case. You don't have 1,000 pages to update, not so much work ;) thnX for the link, - useful site /respects, /mz

Post by **interruptor** » Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:59 pm

ok.. updated your links (bass and links page) and this keyword stuff! peace Daniel

Mike Zee · Post by **Mike Zee** » Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 am

<IMG SRC="http://www.interruptor.ch/cgi-bin/discu ... /happy.gif" ALT=":)"> /mz

DELETED · Post by **DELETED** » Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:09 pm

DELETED