| Author | 
Message | 
 
      
  beardeddubster
  | | Posted on Wednesday, October 02, 2002 - 09:25 pm:    |  |  
   i jjust talked on the phone to a bloke who is selling an re150 for £225 and a re501 for £300  he says the sound on sound  isn't as good on the 501 compared to a 301    he is not willing to budge on the price, but says the re150 "looks brand new"     they are advertised as mint condition    any advice much welcome  |  
      
  Looter
  | | Posted on Thursday, October 03, 2002 - 07:45 am:    |  |  
   Get the 150.  the spring reverb isnt that great on the rolands anyway.  unless youre going for that kind of sound..    If you want sound-on-sound for a more modest price look at a multivox tape echo.  I have two    The korg stage echos also have s-o-s, i believe.  |  
      
  beardeddubster
  | | Posted on Saturday, October 05, 2002 - 01:07 pm:    |  |  
   would you consider selling one of the multivoxes?  I am in Uk, where are you?  |  
      
  looter
  | | Posted on Wednesday, October 16, 2002 - 06:05 pm:    |  |  
   sorry beardeddubster, I'm not going to sell either of mine just yet.  i'm in the US also so shipping and crating would be expensive.  |  
      
  John Foreplay
  | | Posted on Wednesday, December 04, 2002 - 04:10 am:    |  |  
   For the price difference I would go for the 501.  I own one and the unit sounds awesome.  Also the 501s are the least noisey of the Roland Tape Delays.  Here (in Australia), a good re501 can fetch up to $1400 (about 450 pounds).  The 150 can get up to $600 (~ 200 pounds).    Also most I've spoken to think that the sound on sound head of the 501 is in a more useful position than the 301, and allows for up to one second delay times.  I have never used a 301 though.    Cheers. John Foreplay  |  
  |