Music by the Interruptor | The Dub Scrolls | Home Page
Demeter RV1

The Dub Discussion Board » DUB PRODUCTION » EFFECTS / SOUND MANIPULATION » REVERB » SPRING REVERB » Demeter RV1 « Previous Next »

Author Message
 

HM
Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 05:50 pm:   

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Jul03/articles/demeterrrv1.asp?session=636ff18fea6cdf3f9655c1c53140512a

HM
 

interruptor
Posted on Friday, January 09, 2004 - 09:56 am:   

(admin note: this thread is about the "Demeter RV1" a high end spring reverb unit for 700 british pound)

demeter rv1
 

Mike Zee
Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 06:57 pm:   

HM, you must agree - this thing is shamelessly OVERpriced. Just look inside. Part of the problem/reason maybe, thou... that it's harder to sell a product like this in general, so to keep the 'producer' in biz you have to price it trippled or so... hmmmmmmmmm ? I am not sure really...just my speculations.
The other side, not to miss!!!! What does it mean exactly "The best sounding spring rever I've tested"....????? Does it mean - 'cleanest' ...or something like this. So then, this maybe not exactly a 'positive' for what you may expect for your specific production needs. The 'dirtynees' of old spring-units/cabs is maybe exactly what you want. well, it all depends...

For 600+ bucks unit, I would want to have allots of control, adjustment(ability) of vary parameters, something handful and useful which you can't find in 'regular' spring unit ala do-it-yourself.... see what I mean? :)

/respects,
/Mike Zee aka Dr. ZEE
 

Mike Zee
Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 07:08 pm:   

this is most eye-hitting line in this review:
You can even use the Real Reverb with drums, though you have to keep the reverb level fairly low to avoid giving the game away.
heh heh :) ... think about it for a moment from point of view of a dub-producer. LOL

/mike zee aka Dr ZEE
 

HM
Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 07:41 pm:   

yes I agree, just wanted to post that this sos
back-issue test was available now, personally
I would prefer this vermona thing:

http://www.sonicstate.com/articles/article.cfm?id=77&page=1

Less price and so many more weakings it gives

I dont care if "stereo" or not, I have a hard
time imagine two matched phase-linear tanks :-)

anyway spring king is not getting replaced soon
 

HM
Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 07:47 pm:   

http://www.netzmarkt.de/thomann/thoali3132.html?sn=5119fadc12dc800dcc0db0cf37e09e24
 

Mike Zee
Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 08:07 pm:   

Vermona products got 'balls' ..heh heh ;) and their spring-box is cool as it can be... extra tweaks make it a creative tool for vary application... not to mention 'kik-crash button' heh heh ;)
From production/technical point, I'd say 'true-stereo' dual spring is sort of silly thing. Send single voice/instrument/chnl through the single spring first, then "stereophonize" it later in the mix :)

/later,
respects,
/Mike Zee aka DrZEE
 

interruptor
Posted on Friday, January 09, 2004 - 09:52 am:   

about true stereo springs: i also experienced that a mono spring is better if you want to bring out the boingy/shattery aspect of a spring reverb. using one spring on the left and one on the right gives a very broad stereo feel but it smoothes out the grittyness of the spring. to get a stereo effect rather pan the reverb slightly or heavily to one side an apply a bit of (digital) room reverb to it.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration